Dr. Orly Taitz continues her efforts to inform the American public of her conviction that Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to hold the Office of the Presidency. I agree.
Dr. Orly suggests an appropriate question in the title of the post:
See if they will talk about the eligibility
Govs Perry, Sanford Host ‘Tea Party 2.0′
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
The anti-tax “tea party” protests held April 15 were so successful that two Republican governors are trying a variation of the formula Thursday.
Rick Perry of Texas and Mark Sanford of South Carolina are holding a town hall meeting by way of a telephone conference call to mobilize support for the anti-tax cause, states’ rights and a smaller federal government.
The event is formally called “The Fight for Freedom Call.” Pundits have dubbed it “Tea Party 2.0.”
Each governor will speak for several minutes, and then they will answer caller questions for an hour. The Republican Governors Association expects 30,000 people to listen in.
To participate, see http://thegopcomeback.com/freedom. (Paste into browser)...Continue Reading
To those who criticize the Tea Parties and those who oppose Obama's policies as somehow in lockstep with the Republican Party image the media has tried so hard to create, you are wrong. The vast majority of Tea Party attendees are Democrats, Independents and Republicans who are deeply concerned about issues and the damage Obama is doing to the American economy. I'm sure that attendee's opinions differ on many issues but they have chosen to coalesce around economic concerns.
The media has embraced the role of advocate from Obama for some time now; and as advocates, they try to unjustly portray everyone who opposes Obama's policies as racist bigots/homophobes and ridicule them without concern for the facts. (Alinsky's Rules for Radicals?)
On that note, I would like to thank The Gender Identity Center of Colorado for including the article Marriage is the Domain of the Church and God in the news section of their site. It's a safe bet that 100% of gicofcolo's readers and I would not agree on 100% of the issues; however, I bet most of us agree on Equal Protection. I don't agree with 100% of anyone's views but I respect them (if they are thoughtful and not just parroting what someone told them).
I'm a "fiscal conservative" who believes the Constitution of the United States is just fine, has served America extremely well and should continue to be her road map to the future. On other issues, I prefer not to be pigeonholed.
Now, I need to turn my attention to making my picks for the Preakness.
