Tea Party - Obama - Media Bias - Boycott GM & - Chrysler - Dr. Orly Taitz - The BOPAC Report

The BOPAC Report:

The World Net Daily is reporting that the Tea Party protests are going global:

A REVOLUTIONARY IDEA
Tea parties going global
More than 2,000 protests planned for Tax Day – even in Denmark
Posted: April 13, 2009

By Chelsea Schilling

Tax Day Tea Party, organizer for April 15 rallies

While WND has found information for more than 700 tea parties, the American Family Association is reporting Tax Day protests for 2,000 cities – and Tax Day Tea Party claims the movement has now spread overseas.

With less than two days before citizens take to the streets, the mainstream media are beginning to report the widespread movement – but many major outlets are doing so in critical columns and television reports.

Media buzz

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote, "Republicans have become embarrassing to watch. And it doesn't feel right to make fun of crazy people."

He said the tea parties are not an accurate representation of public sentiment...Continue Reading

While the media may choose to ignore the Tea Party participants, I want to remind them who we are:

From Symbolic Acts Might Just Set In Motion:

...

The fact that there are millions of Americans upset, they appear to have resolve, there are meaningful symbolic actions that can be taken, and that all the actions/issues have a cumulative effect - these are the keys for the People to be able to make progress.

Who are we and what are our resources? I have not seen any definitive demographics about the groups who are opposing Obama’s reckless economic policies, the people who are supporting the scores of lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to serve as President, those in the military (active, reserve, retired, veterans) who are troubled by Obama’s lack of support for the military, those supporting Larry Sinclair’s efforts get his story in the public domain (free speech, media cover-up), those tired of the media having leftist agendas that shape their reporting, those worried about the “fairness doctrine” coming back, those who are sick the media’s bias against Israel, those who oppose Obama’s extreme abortion policies, those who are worried about our Second Amendment right to bear arms, those who are trying to protect State’s rights and those who are trying to protect the sanctity of the Constitution of the United States. (Please excuse if I left anyone out.)

But if I had to guess, I would say that most could be described as the “salt of the earth” or the “backbone of America.” I bet most are middle aged and up, middle income, have jobs and families, pay their share of taxes, love America, stand for the National Anthem, are more concerned with principles rather than Party identification, have a belief in a higher power, try to be self-reliant, have served in the military or have lots of family members who have served and lastly, they probably make up a big percentage of those consuming the lion’s share of American products.

This last attribute might just the one that can finally get our leaders attention and break through the media’s reluctance to cover anything that impacts negatively on the Obama “Fairy Tale”.

Right now the most identifiable/targetable symbols of corporations trying to feed on American taxpayers and Union leaders who would risk running their employers out of business rather than consider meaningful concessions are General Motors and Chrysler!

What do suppose would happen if a nationwide boycott of GM and Chrysler vehicles were called and would last until GM and Chrysler returns the money Obama and Congress are trying to suffocate America’s free market system with?...Continue Reading

CitizenWells has an important update regarding Dr. Orly Taitz:

I just got off the phone with Dr. Orly Taitz. We spoke for a while about her website and the recent controversy. Dr. Taitz has a new website for Defend Our Freedoms.

http://repubx.com/

Orly stated that Defend our Freedoms is her foundation and that she has been blocked from accessing her data on the previous website. She is still committed to the cause of exposing the truth about Barack Obama.

We also spoke about the US Supreme Court, Justice Scalia, Chief Justice Roberts and law clerk Danny Bickell. She and I are both concerned that Bickell is still employed at the Supreme Court after all of the shady dealings that she and other attorneys experienced from Danny Bickell.

Dr. Orly Taitz will attend the San Antonio, TX tea party...Continue Reading

Support The Montana Resolution Now So We Might Have A Place To Go If Sen. Obama Is Elected And We Become A Collective Led By The Extreme Left Shepherd

The time has come to throw our support behind the efforts of several Montana Elected Officials in their efforts to get the Supreme Court of the United States to recognize that a decision in D.C. v. Heller that interprets the Second Amendment of the U. S. Constitution as being a “Collective Right” as opposed to an “Individual Right” would violate Montana’s Compact with the United States, the contract by which Montana entered the Union in 1889. (Send a message of support!)

The Montana Resolution’s position finds its basis in the law of contracts, compacts, and treaties and is eloquently set forth in the conclusion of the Resolution’s Argument:

In 1889, Montana and the other several states entered into a contract - struck a bargain. That contract was reduced to writing and is found today as Montana’s Compact with the United States and is recorded at Article I of the Montana Constitution. In that contract, via adoption of the corollary and required Ordinance 1, Montana adopted the U.S. Constitution, definitely including the Second Amendment. Congress and the President, acting as agents for the states, allowed Montana into the union contingent upon Montana proffering an acceptable state constitution. That constitution, as it was accepted by Congress and the President, included the reservation of the right of “any person” to bear arms, a clearly individual right maintained and asserted today in exactly the same verbiage used in 1889.

The arguments set forth in the Montana Resolution make the case that if a collective right is found then the United States would have breached the contract/compact it made in good faith with the people of Montana.[i] This could ultimately lead to Montana deciding that they are no longer in the Union. What would President Obama do? I am drawn to this argument because I believe that the Second Amendment was the founding father’s ace card to protect against the rise of a dictator or fascist government in the United States. The People, each person, might have some degree of power to stand against whoever is threatening to corrupt of the highest principles that were articulated in the Constitution.

So why is this important today? What’s the urgency? If the 08 Election goes as many have said, we could very well have a House and Senate led by a bigger Democratic majority. While many Democrats and Republicans are in the middle politically, basically in touch with the core of American values and people, and want to work together (I hope) to pass laws that support our values, our interests, and respect our military - given the current political environment, it is hard to do. Especially given that many in today’s Democrat Party seem highly influenced by an extreme left that makes a lot of us feel as though they really do hate America, despise our military and our principles. My opinion of the legislative process that this 2006 Congress, led by Sen. Reid and Rep. Pelosi, has operated under is that they are only interested in vilifying their way towards legislation. They do not appear interested in making legislation that protects individual liberties, allows us to quickly be energy independent, protects our economy or fosters individual responsibility. What they do seem to be intent on doing is creating the ultimate nanny state where the voters will be so dependent on them that they never get thrown out of office.

Additionally, there exists the distinct possibility that the Executive Branch might be led by the most liberal and inexperienced person ever to pursue the office, Sen. Obama. This is a person who has not been looked at very closely by the main stream media and the more we discover, the more the Senator’s past and current associations appear very suspect. This is a person whose campaign has been given a pass by the media for most things that they would have jumped on had it involved Sen. Clinton or Sen. McCain. If it were not for Talk Radio we would not have found out about any of Sen. Obama’s warts. The media and Obama supporters are also complicit in trying to cover up issues that continue to follow the Senator.[ii] This is a person if you look at his upbringing, past mentoring, and associations point to a life view that believes the government must control all aspects of our lives. This is a person that doesn’t know the difference between Memorial Day and Veteran’s day.[iii] I could go on and on.

Taken together, what this means is:

• That the Supreme Court have activist judges appointed when openings occur.

• That we will lose more and more access to opposing views. Talk Radio will be in jeopardy. It is the only voice that presents any news or opinions different from the mostly liberal main stream media.

• That our economy will have a drastic down turn because taxes will be increase on corporations to the point that they will not be competitive. They will only pass the extra cost on to the consumers (you and me). They will be forced to decrease their work force to reduce costs to stay as competitive as they can be.

• AND, The Second Amendment will be eviscerated.

This is why we should support the Montana Resolution. When the remaining 49 states go into their deep decline, they will be the model that we can look to for the way forward. They are good people, with strong ties to the earth, practical people, reasoned people and they are a part of a dying breed of people that still have a concept of limited government. We all need to be reminded of that. I do understand that the government will not let Montana withdraw from the Union. I’m a rural Independent Voter.

---

[i] See http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56914

[ii] See http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/ and http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/

[iii] See http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=65449