The Globe: Where Obama Was Really Born?

The Globe continues to do the job the media should be doing. Today, they have a preview of the coming edition.

Obama Under Fire!

PRESIDENT-elect Barack Obama is being hit by shocking charges - it's against the law for him to take office because he isn't a "natural-born" U.S. citizen! A stunning lawsuit by a former government official claims the 47-year-old politician was actually born in Kenya, which would disqualify him from office. GLOBE's Special Report rips the lid off the simmering controversy. It's must reading for every American!

It will be interesting to see how deeply Globe Magazine covers this long ignored story!


It is also about time the media deal with Larry Sinclair's allegations that he and Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999.

Obama's Online Birth Certificate Is Merely Prima Facie Evidence - However, It Has Been Contradicted By Alleged Facts

Dr. Orly has an excellent post up about "prima facie evidence" and how it relates to Obama's Birth Certificate (the questionable one).

From Dr. Orly:

Wednesday, December 31, 2008
OBAMA HAS NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF PROVING HE WAS BORN IN HAWAII

By now, many of us know about the Certification of Live Birth (COLB) that Obama posted on the internet in June 2008 as proof that he was born in Hawaii. This document was touted by fightthesmears.com and factcheck.org as sufficient proof that he was born in Hawaii. Later on we learned about Hawaiian law in effect at the time of Obama's birth that allowed parents or guardians of babies born in a foreign country to register the foreign births in Hawaii and to receive a COLB as evidence of that registration. We also learned that only the original Certificate of Live Birth (BC), issued by the birth hospital, provides, among other things, the name of the hospital where a baby was born and the name of the attending physician that delivered the baby. We learned that the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (a state agency that happens to detail the difference) states:

In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.

After learning this information many concerned Americans had doubts about whether the COLB was sufficient proof that Obama was in fact born in Hawaii. But apart from the lax Hawaii law, there is another important point to understand about the COLB.

If one reads the document, one will see that at the bottom it states: "This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding."

The important words here are "prima facie evidence." "Prima facie" is a Latin phrase meaning "on its first appearance" or "by first instance." It is evidence which is adequate, if not invalidated, to confirm a particular intention or fact. It is evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact or to establish the fact in question unless rebutted. A prima facie case may be insufficient to enable a party to prevail if the opposing party introduces contradictory evidence. In other words, it basically means that on the face of it or on the surface there is enough evidence to prove the alleged fact, unless and until the alleged fact is contradicted...Continue Reading

Happy New Year!

Retired Military Colonel Gregory S. Hollister Files Suit Against Obama - Philip Berg

Add one more lawsuit against Obama challenging his eligibility to hold the Office of the Presidency. Philip Berg and Lawrence J. Joyce are representing Retired Military Colonel Gregory S. Hollister in a new lawsuit filed against Barack H. Obama. This case is very different factually in that the Plaintiff is a person who could be called upon to take orders from a President Obama. The Plaintiff NEEDS to know "whether or not to follow any Order of Soetoro a/k/a Obama."

Where's the media? AWOL I have to say that the Media is consistent in following Obama's orders without question.

Update from ObamaCrimes:

For Immediate Release: - 12/30/08

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 12/30/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States which is pending in the U.S. Supreme Court [Docket No. 08 – 570] with two [2] Conferences scheduled on January 9th and 16th 2009, filed suit against Barry Soetoro a/k/a Obama on behalf of a Retired Military Colonel.

Berg today, with co-counsel Lawrence J. Joyce, Esquire, filed another lawsuit in Federal Court in the United States District for the District of Columbia on behalf of Retired Colonel Hollister against Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama demanding to know Obama’s real name and if he is constitutionally qualified to be President. Plaintiff, Gregory S. Hollister, is a resident of Colorado Springs, Colorado and Hollister has “standing” and needs a decision so he knows whether or not to follow any Order of Soetoro a/k/a Obama.

The suit is in the nature of an Interpleader that shifts the burden of proof to the Defendants, Soetoro a/k/a Obama and Biden to show that they are “qualified” for office.

Berg stated, “I am determined, on behalf of the 320 million citizens in the United States, to see that “our U.S. Constitution” is followed. Specifically, in the case of Soetoro a/k/a Obama, does he meet the constitutional qualifications for President ? I do not believe so based upon: 1) Obama was born in Kenya and because his mother was not nineteen [19], he was only “naturalized” and therefore, not qualified to be President; 2) Obama was legally adopted/acknowledged in Indonesia at the approximate age of six [6] and attended school as “Barry Soetoro,” [his step-father is Lolo Soetoro] for four [4] years – Indonesia did not have dual citizenship and to attend school, he had to be adopted or acknowledged and he became a “natural” citizen of Indonesia; 3) when he returned to Hawaii at age ten [10], there is a question if he returned through U.S. Immigration – (a) if he did, Barry Soetoro would have been given a “Certification of Citizenship” that would have indicated he was a “naturalized” U.S. citizen since he was a “natural” citizen of Indonesia; or (b) if he did not go through immigration, which I believe, then Soetoro a/k/a Obama is an illegal alien and therefore, not constitutionally qualified to be President and his three [3] years as an U.S. Senator were a fraud.”

Berg continued, “I am appalled that the main stream media continues to ignore this issue as we are headed to a ‘Constitutional Crisis.’ There is nothing more important than our U.S. Constitution and it must be enforced. I am encouraged that the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled two [2] Conferences to look into the merits of our allegations. I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally qualified ‘natural-born’ citizen and therefore, is ineligible to assume the Office of the President of the United States.

Obama, knows he is not ‘natural born’ as he knows where he was born and he knows he was legally adopted/acknowledged in Indonesia; is an attorney, Harvard Law head of the Law Review and graduate who taught Constitutional law; knows the Obama candidacy is the biggest ‘hoax’ attempted on the citizens of the United States in over 200 years; places our Constitution in a ‘crisis’ situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be blackmailed by leaders around the world.”

Berg concluded, “I will continue my efforts until Obama either proves he is qualified or does the right thing and states that he is proud that he, an African American, received more votes than anyone else in the Presidential election on November 4, 2008, but because of things in his past, he must withdraw his name.”

For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
Cell (610) 662-3005

philjberg@obamacrimes.com

--------------------------

Here we have a military officer asking whether or not to follow any Order of Soetoro a/k/a Obama. Will the media cover this? We other active duty military join the lawsuit?

Berg - “I am appalled that the main stream media continues to ignore this issue as we are headed to a ‘Constitutional Crisis.’ There is nothing more important than our U.S. Constitution and it must be enforced."

I bet the media will remain AWOL. Just as they did regarding Larry Sinclair's allegations that he and Obama did cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999, the media will sit on their hands and pray that it all just goes away. Just as they have on all the other lawsuits questioning Obama eligibility, the media will sit on their hands and hope for a ticket to the ball. Journalism 2009 - Dead on Arrive!

Berg's Ugent Appeal For Letters To Supreme Court Of The United States

Philip Berg has an urgent appeal up regarding the upcoming Conferences on January 9 & 16th. I would like to join his plea for citizen support.

Contact both the Supreme Court Justices and Members of Congress to urge action.

Visit Citizenwell's "U.S. Constitution Hall of Shame" to see how uninformed the recent responses are from our representatives. Call them. Time is Short! End 2008 with an act of citizen involvement to protect our Constitution.

From ObamaCrimes:

Urgent – Write Letters to Supreme Court Justices

Case of Berg vs. Obama, U.S.S.C. Case No. 08-570, in the U.S. Supreme Court has been scheduled for two [2] Conferences [January 9th and 16th, 2009].

The Justices of the Supreme Court will read letters sent to them. Let them know how important it is for them to hear our case; how “standing” is important on the issue of Obama’s qualifications; how we are headed for a “Constitutional crisis” if Obama’s qualifications are not resolved; how important it is to follow “our Constitution;” and how Obama’s records: his original ‘vault’ birth certificate, immigration records when he as Barry Soetoro [adopted in Indonesia] returned to Hawaii in 1971, if any, and any change of name Court records are necessary as Obama might be an illegal alien, not only not qualified to be President, but a fraud as U.S. Senator from Illinois.

Write one [1] letter to the nine Justices of the United States Supreme Court (names are listed below), make nine [9] copies and put them in nine [9] separate envelopes, addressed to each Justice, and then place them into one [1] manila envelope and mail to:

U.S. Supreme Court
1 First Street, N.E
Washington, D.C. 20543

Supreme Court Justices

Chief Justice John Roberts

Associate Justices:

Samuel A. Alito
Clarence Thomas
Antonin Scalia
Anthony M. Kennedy
David H. Souter
John Paul Stevens
Stephen G. Breyer
Ruth Bader Ginsberg

Note: Any communications received by the U.S. Supreme Court via e-mail or fax are thrown away. The U.S. Supreme Court will not take telephone messages for the Justices. All communications to the U.S. Supreme Court must be done in writing and sent to them by way of U.S. mail, UPS, Federal Express, etc.

Representatives Earn Membership In "The U.S. Constitution Hall of Shame" Regarding Obama Birth Certificate Controversy

CitizenWells has recently embarked on a new project called

“The U.S. Constitution Hall of Shame”

Mr. Wells is in the process of presenting a collection of letters written by members of Congress (House and Senate) in response to citizen inquires about President Elect Obama’s failure to minimally prove he meets the eligibility requirements set forth in the Constitution. The overall sense one gets from reading these letters is one of disappointment and anger towards our representatives. The wholly deficient content of each letter written is why its author has regrettably earned his or her place in The U.S. Constitution Hall of Shame.” (To date there are 10 Members in the Hall of Shame.) Mr. Wells also points out the defects of each letter as he posts them.

This important work opens with a gentle reminder to our Senators and Representatives of the oath they took when they began their service to “We The People” and “The Constitution.”

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Congressional oath of office

Following this reminder, Mr. Wells has provided links to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives so readers can easily find contact information for his or her representatives. I strongly urge every person that is concerned about this issue to contact as many members of Congress as you can. Call them, as time is getting short. We need to find (persuade) at least one Senator and Representative to make a written objection to the vote of the Electoral College when the Congress meets on January 8, 2009. Such a move could also help persuade the Supreme Court to grant Certiorari in Berg v. Obama when they discuss the case in Conference on January 9, 2009.

This is followed by the listing of the members of the Hall of Shame and their letters.

It is clear that our Senators and Representatives have failed to do sufficient research regarding the numerous lawsuits challenging Sen. Obama’s eligibility to fully understand the legal implications (or lack thereof) of each decision made by the various courts. (Alternatively, they are intentionally trying to mislead.) I was further shocked to find only a superficial understanding of the Constitutional eligibility requirements for the Office of the Presidency.

The authors of the letters presented so far are also woefully misinformed about what can be determined from the documents that the Obama campaign and his supporters have tried to pass off as Obama’s original birth certificate. Most Members of Congress parrot the AP’s unfounded implication that Obama was born in Hawaii and that it was confirmed by officials in Hawaii. It was not. Until we see the long form of the birth certificate, no such implication can be drawn.

From the Alan Keyes lawsuit

“A press release was issued on October 31, 2008, by the Hawaii Department
of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Dr. Fukino said that she
had “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of
Health has Senator Obama’s original birth certificate on record in
accordance with state policies and procedures.” That statement failed to
resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation and press accounts.
Being “on record” could mean either that its contents are in the computer
database of the department or there is an actual “vault” original.”

“Further, the report does not say whether the birth certificate in the
“record” is a Certificate of Live Birth or a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.
In Hawaii, a Certificate of Live Birth resulting from hospital documentation,
including a signature of an attending physician, is different from a
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth. For births prior to 1972, a Certificate of
Hawaiian Birth was the result of the uncorroborated testimony of one witness
and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up
to one year from the date of the child’s birth. For that reason, its value
as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome if any of the
allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained.
The vault (long Version) birth certificate, per Hawaiian Statute 883.176
allows the birth in another State or another country to be registered in
Hawaii. Box 7C of the vault Certificate of Live Birth contains a question,
whether the birth was in Hawaii or another State or Country. Therefore,
the only way to verify the exact location of birth is to review a certified
copy or the original vault Certificate of Live Birth and compare the name of
the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor against the
birthing records on file at the hospital noted on the Certificate of the
Live Birth.”

ACT NOW! CALL THE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND URGE THEM TO PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTION.

Lightfoot v Bowen - One More Step Up Ladder For Lightfoot Against Obama

Lightfoot, et. al. takes another step up ladder. Hopefully, Chief Justice Roberts will set it for Conference.

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a524.htm

No. 08A524
Title:
Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants
v.
Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S168690)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 12 2008 Application (08A524) for a stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A524) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 29 2008 Application (08A524) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.


~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioners:
Orly Taitz 26302 La Paz (949) 683-5411
Counsel of Record Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Party name: Gail Lightfoot, et al.

Dr. Orly - Berg Called Obama Out On Birth Certificate - Obama Spends Vast Sums To Keep It Secret!

Dr. Orly, in her continuing efforts to discover the truth about Obama's Birth Certificate, has a new post up that dispels the recent efforts of Obama supporters to make this issue go away.

However, the part of the article that interests me the most is the "Common Sense" analysis of Berg calling Obama out regarding his original long form birth certificate (which has never been presented). Instead of producing this document and putting all of the allegations to rest, Obama chose to lawyer up and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep the document secret. As Dr. Orly states, "Where there is smoke, there is fire." How true - that's what most people's experience teaches.

...As Berg has revealed, when he first filed his lawsuit in August, he fully expected that he would be hit with a defamation suit by the Obama camp and that a certified copy of Obama's long form Hawaiian birth certificate would be made public. Neither of these events occurred.

Instead, Obama hired a team of lawyers, from Sandler, Reif and Young, PC (a lawfirm that has repeatedly defended "unindicted co-conspirators", the Council on American-Islamic Relations) to prevent the release of his birth records. And over the months, Obama spent considerable sums of money in one legal maneuver after another to keep his documents from being released.

In other words, Berg "called Obama out". That is, Berg "called Obama's bluff". The only way to tell if these discussions on the internet were just a dumb rumor or two about Obama's birth location and eligibility was to call Obama's bluff, which Berg did.

When Obama responded the way he did, then suspicions were raised. At that point, this turned from just another silly uncomfirmed rumor into a serious question.

Things have now been compounded after another two dozen lawsuits in various legal venues have been launched. In dealing with one complaint after another, Obama, through several teams of lawyers now, has stymied and blocked any and all attempts to probe into his true origins and eligibility.

The eligibility question is now far more visible. Several cases have reached the US Supreme Court, or various State Supreme Courts. The media has belatedly started to cover this story.

Obama's response to Berg's first legal action changed the minds of many, including me. I ignored this situation at first because it hardly seemed worthy of attention.

However, when I observed how Obama treated Berg's requests that he confirm his eligibility, I realized that there was something serious going on here. Where there is smoke, there is fire.... Continue Reading

I'm also interested in Dr. Orly's statement, "The media has belatedly started to cover this story." I don't think I would go so far as to say they are covering the story. They only give lip service to the story. Many of the stories I've seen misstates (or omits) many of the facts and law.

I wonder if the media will belatedly start covering Larry Sinclair's allegations that he and Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999 when his new book is published?

Obama - Usurper in Chief?

We are quickly approaching the time when it is likely that the first Constitutionally ineligible person will attempt to be sworn in as President of the United States of America. There are two more obstacles standing in the way of the possibility that a Usurper in Chief will occupy the Oval Office:

On January 6, 2009, the House and Senate will count the Electoral College votes. However, if one Senator and one member of the House objects, the process will stall. With a Democrat controlled House and Senate, it is unlikely that such an exercise in courage would block the Congress from proceeding to say that Obama won the election.

On January 9, 2009, the Supreme Court of the United States will bring up in conference the case of Berg v. Obama to decide if the wish to hear Mr. Berg's allegations that Obama is not a "natural born" citizen within the meaning of the Constitution. It will take an extraordinary amount of courage for the Court to perform its duty and take a serious look at the possibility that Obama does not meet the Constitutional requirements to hold the Office of the Presidency. I pray they do, but I'm not holding my breath.

However, all will not be lost. In the event, Obama is sworn in as President, a steady stream of lawsuits will be forthcoming challenging every law he attempts to sign. A few weeks ago Dr. Vieira wrote a very informative article that everyone should read in its entirety. I agree with most of Dr. Vieira's article, especially the part dealing with any of Obama's laws that impact on the rights of the criminally accused. In the case of a Criminal Defendant,standing would NOT be an issue.

...The next steps in the process of selecting a President are: (i) for the Electoral College to vote, and then (ii) for Congress to count those votes. The Twelfth Amendment provides (in pertinent part) as follows:

The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President...

..The Amendment specifies no grounds, procedure, or standards on or by which any elector’s vote may be challenged for any cause, by either the Electors or Members of Congress. But Congress has enacted a statute that partially addresses this matter:

Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors.... Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision...

Even if this legislation is itself a constitutional implementation of the Twelfth Amendment under the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18), it does not purport to provide for, let alone guarantee, a correct result:

First, without an objection “signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives” no inquiry at all can go forward. Yet the mere absence of an objection—particularly without any explanation—cannot preclude the possibility that an Elector’s vote ought to be the subject of an objection and may prove on examination to be objectionable. Indeed, in these times, the very absence of an objection may indicate only that “the good old boys” in Congress—Democrats certainly, and Republicans most likely, too—have “cut a deal” among themselves behind the scenes in order to suppress an investigation the inevitable and unavoidable results of which would demonstrate the utter bankruptcy, if not criminality, of the present electoral process—in that an individual possibly not “eligible to the Office of President” and his handlers may have managed to bamboozle, bribe, blackmail, or otherwise subvert, suborn, or silence both of the “two” major political parties, the big media, the pundits, and every public official with civil or criminal jurisdiction over elections throughout both the General Government and the States.

Second, although a correct result requires a complete inquiry into an objection, with appropriate findings of fact and law supported by competent evidence, the statute merely requires “a decision” each from the Senate and the House of Representatives. On what basis and with what formality and content these “decision[s]” are to be made the statute does not specify. For instance, are the Senate and the House to hold hearings, to and at which witnesses will be subpoenaed and documents will be required to be produced for inspection and analysis? What rules of evidence will apply at these hearings? Who will have the ultimate burden of proof? What will be the standard of proof—a preponderance of the evidence, clear and convincing evidence, or evidence beyond a reasonable doubt? The queries are legion, the answers unknown.

Yet the Constitution demands that, if such an inquiry is held, it should arrive at the correct conclusion with sufficient evidence in support. After all, the question of Obama’s eligibility vel non is not within the discretion of Congress to skirt or to decide as its Members may deem politically or personally expedient. Even by unanimous vote, Congress cannot constitutionally dispense with the requirement that Obama must be “a natural born Citizen,” by simply assuming that he is such, or by accepting something other than what lawyers call “the best evidence” (in this case, his supposed original Hawaiian birth certificate, as opposed to some purported “certification of live birth” computer-generated only decades later).

Therefore, if no objection at all is made to any Elector’s vote for Obama—or if no objection to an Elector’s vote on the specific basis that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” (and therefore the Elector cannot constitutionally vote for him) is allowed—or if such an objection is allowed, but no searching and complete inquiry, or no inquiry at all, is had—or if partisan Senators and Representatives jury rig “decision[s]” that whitewash Obama on the facts or the law—or some other gross irregularities appear in the process—then thereafter the matter cannot be said to have been settled to a constitutional sufficiency. Congress simply cannot “waive,” or simply flub, the Constitution’s eligibility requirement “to the Office of President” by inaction, or incompetent action, or collusive action

In sum, if the statute does not guarantee (within human competence) that a correct answer to the question be had, then it cannot be deemed to be the exclusive remedy in the premises if (as will be discussed below) a better remedy is available. Moreover, even if the statute is employed to hear and decide challenges to Obama’s eligibility, the resulting “decision[s]” must provide assurances to a moral certainty that the correct answer has indeed been obtained in both fact and law—otherwise, further inquiry needs to be had in other fora. For the consequences of an incorrect answer on the ultimate issue, later exposed as such, are far too serious to allow for any lesser degree of surety. Never were the stakes from a game of “truth or consequences” higher than they are now.

Assume, however, that no inquiry, or only a perfunctory inquiry, or only an obviously tainted inquiry takes place at the stage of counting the Electors’ votes. Is the issue then forever foreclosed? Not at all. For a extensive class of litigants who absolutely do have “standing” to challenge Obama’s eligibility will come into existence, and demand relief as a matter of undeniable constitutional right and practical necessity, as soon as Obama’s Department of Justice attempts to enforce through criminal prosecutions some of the controversial legislation that the new Congress will enact and Obama will sign—such as statutes aimed at stripping common Americans of the firearms to which (in Obama’s derisive terminology) they “cling.”

For example, in a criminal prosecution under a new statute that reinstates the Clinton “assault-weapons ban” (or some equally obnoxious affront to Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16 and the Second Amendment), the defendant will undeniably have “standing” to challenge the indictment on the grounds that no statute imposing such a ban even exists, because the original “Bill which * * * passed the House of Representatives and the Senate” was never “presented to the President of the United States”, and therefore could never “become a Law,” inasmuch as the supposed “President,” Barack Obama, being constitutionally ineligible for that office, was then and remains thereafter nothing but an usurper. [See Article I, Section 7, Clause 2 and Article II, Section 1, 4]...

Continue Reading Dr. Vieira's article.

CitizenWells is starting a new series of articles called “Constitution Hall of Shame.” This new series looks like it will be highly informative and useful should people decide to contact their Representatives in the House and Senate.

Dr. Orly also has an open letter to the members of Congress up that is of interest.

So where is the media? AWOL as usual. Just as they have been throughout the election, they remain Obama's cheerleaders. Just as they ignored Larry Sinclair's allegations that he and Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999, the media continues to ignore anything that cast Obama in a negative light.

For me personally, Obama will not be my President unless he proves that he is eligible to hold the Office. I will owe no allegiance to him or his policies until he shows that he respects the Constitution of the United States enough to comply with its provisions.

When Obama Becomes The Appeaser In Chief - What Will Become Of Israel?

The following is from Atlas Shrugs. I want to call particular attention to the last sentence that is quoted. "What will happen when the 90lb weakling usurps his seat in the White House?" That is an excellent question. I too am deeply worried about Israel's fate with the possibility of The Appeaser In Chief in command of our forces. I pray that the Supreme Court of the United States will not shirk its duty when considering Berg v.Obama in Conference on January 9, 2009.
__________________________

HAMAS'S HANUKAH!

Nidra Poller in Paris on the Israel counter attack to defend itself against Islamic jihad.

HAZAK ! Hamastan is getting the Hanuka treatment, special delivery for evildoers. It seems the mighty jihadis were caught by surprise. Not me. Listening between the words of leftist Israeli journalists interviewed on our Jewish radio stations this week, I was sure the attack was imminent. It’s one of those times when Israel speaks with one voice and acts with one determination. Even the wimpy Olmert government could not dawdle any longer. Only two days ago the Hamasniks were gloating over Israeli indecision. These jihadis operate in closed circuit minds. Once they convince themselves they are winning, they whip up a whirlwind of delusion. Now look at them, battered and bloodied, stunned and dazed, caught in full dress uniform, whining and calling for help.

As Israel stands tall and proud, exercising its sovereignty, European Jews threaten to bomb the carpets in Strasbourg and mow down the sprouts in Brussels if E.U. officials don’t stop spouting off their mouths. Not really. But it’s no more of a joke than the Automated Out of Office Replies registered early this afternoon in the French media. The French presidency of the E.U. is calling for an immediate ceasefire and, incidentally, requesting that Hamas refrain from shooting rockets into Israel. The French presidency of France, no surprise, is making the same inane statement. And so it goes down the line, flutters of indignation from automatic official responders while the real leaders are out to breakfast lunch and dinner in the empty year-end week. Never at a loss for a lie, French media have thrown the U.S. in with the hypocrites under a one size fits all headline claiming that the international community is calling for a ceasefire. In fact, the U.S. position is radically different. Wishing that Israelis will do their best to avoid civilian casualties, our government more or less told Hamas it got what it was asking for.

This is now. What will happen when the 90lb weakling usurps his seat in the White House?...

Continue Reading

Will the U.S. Media abandon Israel again? I'm sure they will if it means being critical of Obama.

New York Times Hires Larry Sinclair In Attempt To Protray Itself As Fair and Unbiased! (Kidding) Larry Sinclair Is Better Than Most of NYT Reporters!

I find it interesting that Pravda allows a wider diversity of opinion than does the New York Times. Maybe the NYT's should contract with Larry Sinclair as free lance reporter given that they are in such bad financial shape? Larry has developed a fairly large following that could improve the NYT's readership.

From Pravda:

...Every American should learn their lesson and never listen to another major media outlet again. Over 30 large newspapers in America are for sale and no takers. Some have cut back on deliveries and some will close. Some of these newspapers have been in business for over 100 years. In less than 10 years of Political Correct “newspeak”, the editors have managed to destroy their companies. The New York Times recently announced that they are seeking a loan against their HQ building which they own 50% of. They need to borrow $250 million. And all they need to do to pay it back is to sell 500 million newspapers...

...People ask me why I publish articles in Russia’s Pravda Online. Many Americans do not realize just how controlled the American media is. Many more do not realize that Russia does have a Free Press that is far freer than the American Press. The answer to the question is a question: How often have you ever seen the truth published in America? What I write does not in any way reflect the opinion of the Russian government or the Russian people. Nor does it reflect the opinion of the editors and employees of Pravda Online. The Russian Constitution allows them the freedom to offer writers a place to express their own views. Anyone who does understand the dangers of an Obama Presidency should be thankful that there is a place where information can be shared, regardless of what Country that may be.

Barack Obama has said to “Get in your neighbor’s face and argue”. That can not be done in America’s major media. They only allow one view, which is whatever theirs is for the day. I would love to be sitting in a back alley some dark night and watch Barry Obama get in Vladimir Putin’s face and argue...

Continue Reading Pravda Article.


In case the NYT is clueless: Larry Sinclair is the man who has alleged (among other things) that he and Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999. This contradicts the assertions that Obama has made in his books.

As an example of Mr. Sinclair's reporting for the NYT to consider, this week Larry Sinclair has been reporting on allegations that -

OBAMA, HALF-SISTER & HAWAII OFFICALS FALSIFY MADELYN DUNHAM DEATH RECORDS!

On October 21, 2008 Barack Obama announced that he would be suspending his campaign after a rally in Indianapolis on Thursday morning, October 23, 2008 to fly to Hawaii to visit with his "gravely ill grandmother." Barack Obama further stated that Madelyn L. Dunham had recently been hospitalized and was back at home after suffering a broken hip. Obama made it clear on October 22, 2008 that there "will be absolutely no video or photo ops during my upcoming visit with my ailing grandmother," and "I do not expect my grandmother to make it to election day."

On Friday October 24, 2008 Michelle Obama during a campaign rally for her husband claimed that "I spoke with tutu last night and she is strong and in good health."

On Friday October 24, 2008 I placed two calls to the home of Madelyn Dunham, in one of those calls I spoke with Obama half-sister Maya Ng http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/2008/10/i-just-spoke-with-senator-obamas-sister.html where Maya claimed Mrs. Dunham could not talk.

On November 3, 2008 both the news media and Barack Obama announced that Madelyn L. Dunham had passed away on that date. Mrs. Dunham was to have celebrated her 89th birthday on the Sunday following Barack Obama's visit, yet no one, not even Barack Obama stopped to wish his "gravely ill" grandmother a Happy Birthday.

After first announcing that Madelyn Dunham had passed away in her sleep on November 3, 2008 (conveniently the day before election day for the sympathy vote) it was reported by Hawaii officials and then by Obama half-sister Maya Ng that Mrs. Dunham had in fact passed away on November 2, 2008. Both reports it turns out are false and it has been reported that Maya Ng and Hawaii officials knowingly and intentionally falsified death records of Madelyn L. Dunham who had actually died prior to Barack Obama arriving on Thursday October 23, 2008 for his claimed visit.

According to sources employed in the coroner's office Madelyn Dunham died on October 21, 2008 and was cremated on Friday October 24, 2008. It is further claimed that the death records of Madelyn L Dunham were falsified at the direct and specific request of Barack Obama and Maya Ng....

Continue Reading.

Eventinually, history will show that Obama is the most secretive person (with the most baggage) ever to seek the Presidency of the United States. Hopefully, Obama will not become President because he does not appear to be eligible under the U. S. Constitution. On January 9, 2008, in Berg v. Obama, the Supreme Court will have another opportunity to do what is right and enforce the Constitutional requirements for the Office of the Presidency.

If the New York Times would like to contact Larry Sinclair, he has contact information on his blog site.

Merry Christmas!

Update On BERG v. Obama from ObamaCrimes and America's Right

Philip Berg has an update on his site.

For Immediate Release: - 12/23/08

U.S. Supreme Court No. 08 - 570

(Washington, DC – 12/23/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States filed again with the U.S. Supreme Court an Application for an Injunction to Stay the Congressional Electoral Vote Count on January 8, 2009 until Obama Proves he is “Qualified” to be President. This time, the Application for Injunction was addressed to Justice Antonin Scalia.

On 12/09/08, Berg Justice Souter denied our Application; then Berg refiled and on 12/17/08 Justice Kennedy also denied the Request for Injunction.

Berg filed this while still waiting to hear if the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the Writ of Certiorari that he filed on October 30, 2008, requesting review of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge Surrick’s Dismissal of Philip J. Berg’s lawsuit against Barack H. Obama, Jr., the DNC and the other co-Defendants regarding “standing.” The Supreme Court has listed the case of Berg vs. Obama for “Conference” on January 9, 2008.

Mr. Berg remarked today, “I am appalled that the main stream media continues to ignore this issue as we are headed to a ‘Constitution Crisis.’ There is nothing more important than our U.S. Constitution and it must be enforced. I am concerned that our Courts have not yet decided to look into the merits of our allegations. I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally qualified ‘natural-born’ citizen and therefore, is ineligible to assume the office of President of. the United States.

Obama, knows he is not ‘natural born’ as he knows where he was born and he knows he was adopted in Indonesia; is an attorney, Harvard Law grad who taught Constitutional law; knows the Obama candidacy is the biggest ‘hoax’ attempted on the citizens of the United States in over 200 years; places our Constitution in a ‘crisis’ situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be blackmailed by leaders around the world.”

Berg concluded, “I will continue to file Court proceedings until Obama either proves he is qualified or does the right thing and states that he is proud that he, an African American, received more votes than anyone else in the Presidential election on November 4, 2008, but because of things in his past, he must withdraw his name.
For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
Cell (610) 662-3005

America's Right also has an update on Berg Motion for Injuction.

Separate conference for injunction scheduled a week AFTER conference on certiorari petition

Apparently, according to the docket for Philip Berg's case at the U.S. Supreme Court, the application for an injunction pending disposition of the petition for certiorari has been "referred to the Court" by Justice Antonin Scalia, with a conference scheduled for Friday, January 16, 2009...

Continue Reading!

Comment: Hopefully, the Supreme Court will do the what's right and act to protect the Constitution. At this point, I'm not sure what is up with scheduling Berg v. Obama on January 9 and the Motion for Injunction on January 16, 2009. Mootness certainly seems to in play for the Motion for Injunction since the underlying event would have already occurred. Who knows? In any event, if the Court fails to act there will certainly be a new round of suits challenging Obama's authority to enact/sign any legislation or executive orders.

The New Year does indeed bring the possibility of fireworks. Berg v. Obama and Larry Sinclair's new book about his alleged drug and sex encounter with Obama will definitely deserve media attention. (Unfortunately our media will be busy courting Obama.) Could there also be an Obama indictment coming in January from the Gov. Blagojevich or Rezko mess? Happy Holidays!

All Roads In Chicago Appear To Lead To Obama - CitizenWells Has Been Spot On For Months Now About Chicago's Corruption.

It seems that everyday another name surfaces in the Chicago Media that CitizenWells has already told us about.

Today we are learning about Raghuveer P. Nayak!

From CitizenWells:
Raghuveer P. Nayak, the unnamed “Individual D” referred
to in the Rod Blagojevich criminal complaint, is seeking
immunity. This is making news because of the Blagojecvich
arrest and potential ties the Obama appointees. However,
like so many names mentioned in the context of Chicago and
IL corrupton, Nayak has ties to Barack Obama and Rod
Blagojevich that go back for years...

Continue Reading to rediscover the other names that CitizenWells has already disclosed in his writings.

Mayor Tom Weisner?

Remember Robert Blackwell Jr.?

Chicago entrepreneur Robert Blackwell Jr. paid Obama an
$8,000-a-month retainer to give legal advice to his growing
technology firm, Electronic Knowledge Interchange.

For doing what? Not much. Hmmm.

Dan Shomon?

Alexi Giannoulias?

Raghuveer P. Nayak today, who tomorrow? Obama?

It would be nice if the media would catch up to the bloggers who are covering this story.

See also The Real Barack Obama for exhaustive coverage of the dirt in Chicago.

Maybe they would also stumble over Larry Sinclair's story about using drugs and having sex with Sen. Obama in 1999? They need to open their eyes first.

American Thinker Article Raises Good Questions - We also need to add - What about all the "Down Low" allegations surrounding Sen. Obama?

A couple of days ago the American Thinker had an interesting article titled Is Obama vulnerable to blackmail?

Is Obama vulnerable to blackmail?
By James Lewis
Suppose you're Bashir Assad or Putin, and you watch the Blago Blowup, a month before the next president even takes office.

What are you thinking right now?

First, Obama looks vulnerable to blackmail. His homey network is full of people who can't stand the light of day. They know all kinds of things the leftist media suppress -- people like Auchi (the Iraqi billionaire), Rezko (the corrupt Syrian multimillionaire), Emil Jones (the Godfather of Southside), and the whole Daley Machine.

That's not even counting the freaky radicals or the pols Obama has surrounded himself with. Mayor Daley's brother is one of the official transition leaders, for heavens' sake, along with Valerie Jarrett and a whole, privately paid operation that doesn't have to follow Federal rules on transparency, lobbying or accounting.

Leverage on the people around Obama is the first step. So you ask your handy secret agents in the US to beat the bushes for more blackmail material. Easy enough. Chicago is a Machine town, and there's always a rumor mill in a town full of neighborhood taverns.

Here's what else the spy masters are sure to be wondering.

1. Is there an organized crime connection in the Obama network?...
Continue Reading

I enjoyed reading this article but the author overlooked all of Larry Sinclair's allegations that he and the Senator used drugs and engaged in consensual sex in 1999. Additionally, there have been numerous rumors floating around Chicago that Sen. Obama has been on "The Down-Low" for some time. ("Down-Low" - a married man that goes out to have gay sex outside of his marriage.) In fact, Larry Sinclair alleges that Sen. Obama was intimately involved with the recently murdered choir director of the Senator's church.

It's unfortunate that Sen. Obama was not properly vetted by the Media prior to the election. I worry that what we know about Sen. Obama is just the tip of the iceberg.

Obama Seems To Be Above The Law!

Michelle Malkin has an excellent piece that clearly demonstrates that many standards are being set aside for Obama. This is an outrage!

Document drop: The story behind Change.gov

By Michelle Malkin • December 20, 2008 09:52 AM

I’ve obtained documents sent to a reader in response to his FOIA request regarding the creation of Barack Obama’s Change.gov website. It gives you the rest of the story. You’ll recall last month that I blogged several questions about the propriety of allowing the perpetual Obama campaign to use a .gov domain name for what appeared to be a fund-raising front. Readers and industry observers noted that the decision appeared to violate General Services Administration rules governing government domains.

Guess what? They were right…

Continue Reading

Comment: Where have the media been? AWOL as usual. It there any scandal that the Media is willing to look at that touches Obama? Probably Not. It seems we need to rely on Pravda to cover Obama with any sort of critical eye. Just as the media did not cover Larry Sinclair’s allegations that he and Sen. Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999, the media turns a blind eye.

Earlier this week someone commented on Larry’s blog about a chapter of Larry’s new book that is both intriguing and speaks to the Media’s culpability.

Below is a comment from feed back on Chapter “1999″ which I asked this individual to read and offer feed-back on.
“Larry, after reading the chapter “1999″ in your book, I have to tell
you that you offer a glimpse into a life that most could never imagine. You describe in shocking detail, elements of our society that not only exist, but are thriving. I believe that everyone who reads your book will be left with overwhelming feelings of fear, disgust and shame to know exactly what we have put into America’s White House. Me personally…I blame the Media. Thanks for your candor and honesty.”

Where have the media been regarding the 21 lawsuits that have been filed challenging Sen. Obama’s eligibility to hold the Office of the Presidency? AWOL as usual. For more information about these lawsuits visit:

http://drorly.blogspot.com/

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

http://www.americasright.com/

http://grou.ps/zapem

CitizenWells is also doing an extensive piece (series of pieces) concerning Governor Rod Blagojevich, Sen. Obama and the connections to a host of other shadowy characters!

Where’s the Media? AWOL

First There Was Congressman John Linder? Who Will Be The Senate's Champion of Justice?

Is there a possibility of an inquiry seeking justice and Constitutional compliance even after the Electoral College has voted? Yes - If one representative from the House of Representatives and one representative from the Senate raise objections regarding Senator Obama's eligibility to hold the Office of the Presidency, then the door could be opened to investigation. However, it will take your urging!

It seems that Congressman John Linder may play the part of seeker of justice for the House of Representatives. Who will play the part on the Senate side? Sen. Inholf? What will you do?

Devvy Kidd has an important article regarding this possibility. I've included first part of this excellent article and I urge you to read it in its entirity.

IMPOSTOR PRESIDENT OBAMA: VICTORY WILL BE SHORT LIVED

Everyday my mail box is filled with requests to investigate corruption at all levels of government. It's regrettable that so much time and effort has to be directed in exposing Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham as a fraud, but it must be done.

In my last exclusive on the U.S. Supreme Court, December 15, 2008: 'Has the U.S. Supreme Court No Shame?' I covered the cowardice by those justices earlier this week. I also wanted to let readers know that I put some of the legal documents from those cases, critical material from Leo Donofrio's web site and the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) case on audio. One of the recordings is also Dr. Edwin Vieira's column dated December 8, 2008; more on that below. This makes it easy for Americans who are overwhelmed with obligations to be able to listen to all this material on your computer, down load to a CD and listen while you drive or onto an IPod and listen on the commute train or on a plane.

The importance of Edwin's column can not be ignored. Despite one of the largest grass roots efforts in the 19 years I've been in the 'freedom movement,' the Supreme Court spit on the U.S. Constitution; so did the electoral college delegates on the same day.

The process is not over yet as Edwin explains in his column: One member of the House of Representatives and one counterfeit U.S. Senator can raise an objection to the vote of the electoral college on January 20, 2009; this must be done:

"Indeed, in these times, the very absence of an objection may indicate only that “the good old boys” in Congress—Democrats certainly, and Republicans most likely, too—have “cut a deal” among themselves behind the scenes in order to suppress an investigation the inevitable and unavoidable results of which would demonstrate the utter bankruptcy, if not criminality, of the present electoral process—in that an individual possibly not “eligible to the Office of President” and his handlers may have managed to bamboozle, bribe, blackmail, or otherwise subvert, suborn, or silence both of the “two” major political parties, the big media, the pundits, and every public official with civil or criminal jurisdiction over elections throughout both the General Government and the States."

Patrick Briley, who has a long history of interaction with Sen. James Inhofe, has formally asked Inhofe to make this objection. The only person in the entire U.S. House of Representatives who might undertake such an objection would be Congressman Ron Paul. I highly recommend everyone read Edwin's column or listen to it in the audio section and then call Sen. Inhofe and Ron Paul's district offices. Request they file a written objection to the vote by the electoral college delegates....

Continue Reading!

Comment: Where is the Media? AWOL Just as they have been throughout the primaries and general election, the media continues the "fairy tale" they have helped to create about Sen. Obama. Larry Sinclair has a different take on Sen. Obama and it will be made public in the form of a new book, debuting soon in bookstores. Some of Mr. Sinclair's allegations contradict Sen. Obama's assertions that he stopped using drugs long ago. Larry Sinclair alleges that he and Sen. Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999, much later that Obama claims.

The truth will come out if brave men and women stand up!

Obambi.com - Congressman Linder Will Confront Obama Eligibility Issue

From Obambi.com:

Congressman John Linder is a true American

I read a post the other day that a Freeper got from Congressman John Linder, Georgia, stating that he would stand and object to Obama if he doesn’t show proof of constitutional eligibility.

I emailed Mr. Linder and asked if he did indeed write that email and if he was serious about holding Obama to task on something as serious as this.

A few moments ago I received a phone call from Congressman Linder’s office confirming that he intends to do exactly that and he is just as intent as us on verifying Obama’s eligibility....Continue Reading

__________________________

Of Note:

Larry Sinclair is in seclusion putting the finishing touches on his new book about his alleged drug and sexual adventures with Sen. Obama in 1999. Good Luck Mr. Sinclair. I salute your courage.

The Holidays may cause a few tummy aches for Sen. Obama.

The Holidays may cause a few tummy aches for Sen. Obama.

Let's see -
Rezko's Talking again.

From CitizenWells:

December 16, 2008 ·

The Chicago Tribune, in an article dated December 16, 2008,
has revealed that the sentencing of Tony rezko has been
delayed again. Apparently Rezko has been talking and revealing
corruption links to Blagovich and other lawmakers. Obama’s name
was mentioned during the Rezko trial and Patrick Fitzgerald has
recently been investigating a real estate deal between Rezko
and Obama. Here is an exerpt from the Tribune article:

“Fundraiser Rezko’s sentencing delayed _ could add to Illinois Gov. Blagojevich’s problems
By MIKE ROBINSON | Associated Press Writer
12:26 PM CST, December 16, 2008

CHICAGO (AP) — Jailed political fundraiser Tony Rezko’s sentencing for corruption was delayed indefinitely Tuesday, most likely adding to the legal problems of embattled Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

The sentencing date of Jan. 6 was erased by U.S. District Judge Amy J. St. Eve. The action appeared to signal that Rezko’s on-again, off-again relationship with the federal prosecutors investigating Illinois government was on again....

Continue Reading:

Patrick Fitsgerald is doing his job.

From CitizenWells:

Just as Citizen Wells has predicted, Patrick Fitzgerald, the
federal prosecutor that led the investigation that indicted
Tony Rezko, Stuart Levine, Dr. Robert Weinstein and recently
arrested Governor Rod Blagojevich of Illinois, is on the trail
of Barack Obama. Obama has long time close ties to these chicago
and Illinois corruption figures and conspired with one or more
of them to rig the IL Health Planning Facilities Board when
Obama was a member of the IL senate.

Jerome corsi has written an article for World Net Daily, dated
December 15, 2008 that reveals Fitzgerald’s ongoing investigation
into Rezko ties and specifically Obama. Here are some exerpts:

“U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald

Since arresting Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald has renewed interest in convicted fundraiser Tony Rezko’s part in the purchase of Barack Obama’s Chicago mansion, according to a former real estate analyst who says he was interviewed by the federal prosecutor in the past 10 days....

Continue Reading

Rahm Emanuel was recorded 21 times by Patrick Fitsgerald.
This is from NOQuarters:

According to Michael Sneed of the Chicago Sun-Times, Rahm Emanuel was not recorded in one, two, three, four or five conversations captured by the feds; he participated in TWENTY-ONE conversations recorded by Fitzgerald’s team.

Allow me to write the number again: 21. I quote Michael Sneed:

Sneed hears rumbles President-elect Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, is reportedly on 21 different taped conversations by the feds — dealing with his boss’ vacant Senate seat!

A lot of chit-chat?

Hot air?

Or trouble?

I guess a lot of trouble. For it was Barack Obama who uttered the following words yesterday:

“I have never spoken to the governor on this subject. I am confident that no representatives of mine would have any part of any deals related to this seat. I think the materials released by the U.S. attorney reflect that fact,” Obama said at a Chicago news conference.

There are twenty-one conversations recorded by the feds that do not “reflect that fact.”

And it was Obama who claimed yesterday an internal investigation of his transition offices conducted by his future White House Counsel yielded no evidence of inappropriate contact with Rod Blagojevich.

President-elect Barack Obama said Monday a review by his own lawyer shows he had no direct contact with Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich about the appointment of a Senate replacement, and transition aides “did nothing inappropriate.”

Maybe Obama will retract this statement now that everyone knows Rahm Emanuel participated in 21 calls recorded by the feds during their investigation of Rod Blagojevich and dirty Chicago machine politics....
Continue Reading

The there's Larry Sinclair's allgegations:

Larry Sinclair's new book about his allegations of using cocaine and having sex with Sen. Obama in 1999 will hit the bookstores in January of 09.


Lastly there's Bernard Madoff's mess:

Maybe the press will start focusing on the fact that Bernard Madoff's fraudulent scheme is a big time Democrat donor? The fact that Madoff is a democrat always seems to be missing from most press reports.

From yahoo news:
One of the largest recipients of Madoff largess was Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who received $39,000 from the family for his two Senate races. Bernard Madoff has given an additional $100,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee since Schumer took its helm in 2005.

Happy Holidays Sen. Obama.

One day the truth will come out.

When are you going to get around to providing proof that you are eligible to hold the Office of the President?

The lawsuits will keep coming even if you are sworn in.

If you sign into law any criminal legislation, the first time it is used against a Criminal Defendant, his or her lawyer will be all over the possibility (probability) that you are not legally entitled to sign any legislation into law because of your possible ineligibility. All of your legislation will be fatally defective.

It's hard to see how you look yourself in the mirror each morning.

Meeting in Sacramento - Election Fraud

The following is from Obambi.com:

Unlawful Occupation of Presidency and Invalid Electoral College Process

Time: Mon 12-15-08, 12:30 PM
Place: California State Capitol, Sacramento California at the Corner of “L” and 11th Streets

STATEMENT OF AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY CHAIRMAN

Questions from Press following statement.

The American Independent Party insists that Barack Obama prove that he is a “Natural born” American citizen. There is no personal testimony that Obama was born in Hawaii as there is that he was born in Mombasa District, now part of Kenya. The burden of proof is on Obama.

Hawaii’s unique laws allow for birth certificates to indicate foreign birth. Is that what his indicates? We have not seen it. Instead of spending tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars resisting its production and even defying a court order to do so, why not spend the $12 to produce a copy for us all to examine? Is the answer, just possibly, that Barack Obama is afraid of what it would reveal?

Similar doubts concerning possible Indonesian citizenship exist. These, too, urgently need to be resolved.

What is about to occur in the State Capitol is fatally flawed in three ways:
1. The likely result is that a man whose qualifications to assume the office of the President are quite dubious will receive our California Electoral College vote because of a judicial disinclination to give the People their right to be heard.
2. Electors apparently not individually nominated by Democratic Congressional Candidates as required by the California Election code will vote in the Electoral College.
3. Electors will be constrained to vote as a block rather than individually as is their right and duty according to procedures set down in the Constitution and will thereby deprive California of a legitimate voice in the Electoral College.On all these grounds and more, I fear greatly for our People. Unlawful occupation of the Office of the President means no new valid legislation. No valid nominations, including to the Supreme Court. No valid Executive Orders. No lawful commands as Commander in Chief.

Such a situation paralyzes legitimate government. The longer the imposture is maintained, the worse it becomes. Reliance upon eventually voided legislation is extremely perilous. Reliance upon the actions of appointees unlawfully occupying offices will prove equally disastrous. But worse is the debilitating distrust of our democratic processes that will ensue. Our democratic system depends upon trust. As Obama swears to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, if he thereby takes office unlawfully, he is actually attacking it. This puts our entire Constitutional order in peril and may destroy the Republic.

Law Office of Gary G Kreep, Esq., Representing Alan Keyes, Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson
932 D St. Suite 2, Ramona CA 92065
Office: 760-787-9907; Cell: 760-803-4029

Conference Contact: Tony Andrade, 916-230-2123; Tony95683@netzero.net
Media Contact: Markham Robinson, State Chairman, American Independent Party; Party HQ: 707-359-4884; Home: 707-448-7062; Office: 707-451-8985; Temp Cell: 707-761-3009; Fax: 707-222-6040

____END_______________

Where is the Media? AWOL as usual.

By the fact that they have not been demanding Obama come clean about his Senate seat being for sale, the Media continues to perpetrate this fraud on the American People.

By the fact that they have done everything possible to hide Larry Sinclair's allegations that he and Sen. Obama did cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999, the Media continues to show that they are in Obama's pocket.

Questions Remain! Govenor Blagojevich

Questions Remain! Excellent You-Tube Video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2M1zMaZPmI&eurl

Obama’s standard answer, “That’s not the (Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, etc.) I once knew” does not cut it. That’s not the Chicago politics Obama once knew? That’s not the Govenor Blagojevich that Obama once knew? BS It’s how Obama rose so fast to the National Stage. The help of the Gov. and Rezko were critical to his rise.

Obama once said, “If they bring a knife, we’ll bring a gun.”

I say - If Chicago style politics brings the potential for the highest level of national political corruption ever seen, it would be nice if the America people could bring a fair and unbiased media to protect the scant political ethics that remains in Washington! Again the Media continues to be AWOL! Just as they failed to report Larry Sinclair’s allegations that he and Sen. Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999, the media is still trying to protect Obama.

I'm Back Home - Recovery will limit my time online.

Hello. I'm back home. Surgery went well. Recovery will be challenging. I will try to participate as I can. Keep Up the struggle for truth. Zach

I'll Be Out For A Few Days

I often accuse the media of being AWOL in regards to their reporting and investigating of the realities of Sen. Obama and his life. Especially in covering Larry Sinclair’s story and the numerous lawsuits challenging Sen. Obama’s eligibility to hold the Office of the Presidency, the media’s failures have been glaring and inexcusable.

Therefore, I want to let everyone know in advance that I’m going to be absent (with leave) for a few days. I’ll be having surgery on Monday the 8^th and expect to be in the hospital for at least 4 days with no internet access. I will be back as soon as I can. I urge everyone to pay close attention to the stories that Sen. Obama and media want to disappear – and get the word out.

Take good care and make it a great day! Zach

WeThePeople to present at The National Press Club on December 8, 2008

WeThePeople to present at The National Press Club on December 8, 2008. The presentation will be about the question of Sen. Obama's citizenship status and the Constitutional requirement that he be "Natural Born" to be eligible to hold the Office of the Presidency.

There is a growing body of evidence and circumstances suggesting that Obama was born in Kenya. Much as been made of the media's (mis)interpretation of the Hawaiian Government Officials' statements. The press has said (or strongly implied) that the Hawaii Officials said that Obama was born in Hawaii. Go back a read the original statements - they never said that Obama was born in Hawaii.

Also of note: Sen. Obama has evidently spent around $800,000 defending hiding his original birth certificate (naming the hospital) in numerous courts - when it would only have cost him $10 to get a copy of the real thing to put all these questions to rest. Hmmm. Would you spend so much money if you had the truth on your side?

Others have been questioning the hospitals in Honolulu and it seems that no hospitals have any records of Obama's birth.

This should be an interesting presentation. Will the MSM be there? We will see.

Cracks are starting to appear in the Main Street Media now because they can't hide it so well in the face of lawsuits, petition drives, National Press Club appearances, Chicago Tribune full page ads, and internet bloggers.

The following is from Press Club's Calendar.

Obama's Citizenship
Time:	1:30 PM
Event Type:	News Conference
Sponsored by:	We the People Foundation
Event Location:	Murrow Room
Details:	Is Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Contact:	Bob Shultz 518-656-3578 bob@givemeliberty.org

_________________________

I hope Mr. Shultz is treated better in Washington D.C. than Larry Sinclair was when he presented at The National Press Club in June of 2008. Mr. Sinclair was arrested on a warrant from Delaware that was later dismissed. All semblance of Delaware's normal law enforcement procedures appeared to be thrown out the window in a blatant attempt to silence Mr. Sinclair prior to his presentation. Due to bad timing on law enforcements part, Mr. Sinclair was able to give his talk and was promptly and unjustly arrested. If he had been speaking out about Sen. McCain, he would have been cheered by the media. Do you remember how much was in the main stream press? Next to nothing. The media was AWOL as always.



The following is from Press Club's June 2008 calendar:

Larry Sinclair on Obama
Time:	3:00 PM
Event Type:	News Conference
Sponsored by:	Veritas Federal Media
Event Location:	Holeman Lounge
Details:	Larry Sinclair on Barack Obama There will be a Pre-Registration for Press beginning at 1:00pm. All press must show media credentials and must obtain an event press pass to enter the event. Washington, D.C. - Despite death threats and an organized campaign to prevent him from speaking publicly, Larry Sinclair -- on June 18, 2008, at 3:00 PM (Sign in begins at 1:00 PM) in the Holeman Lounge of the National Press Club, 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045, will for the first time reveal the corroborating evidence for his claim that on November 6 + 7, 1999, Larry: (i) met Obama at a gay bar where Barrack Obama arranged for the purchase of federal Schedule II drugs, (ii) which Larry and Obama thereafter ingested and (iii) then engaged in hi-risk, homosexual activities. Larry's story burst on to the scene on January 18, 2008, when Larry released a short video containing these allegations on YouTube.com. That video has had close to a million views yet the mainstream media has completely ignored Larry's serious allegations. Thereafter, a clearly orchestrated campaign to discredit Larry began on the internet which forced Larry to resort to federal court to protect his reputation. At the press conference, Larry will (i) reveal the corroborating evidence for his allegations regarding Obama, (ii) address the time-line of the response of the Obama campaign to his allegations and the murder of Donald Young, the openly gay choir director of Trinity United Church of Christ, Obama's now-former church and (iii) the significance of the refusal of U.S. District Court Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. to allow Larry's case to proceed.
Contact:	Montgomery Sibley 202-248-3973 mbsibley@earthlink.net

_______________________

See also: http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Mr-Obamas-Eligibility-Aired-Monday/story.aspx?guid=%7B35E191D7-D7BD-4722-BAF1-E6C0CBC18EA3%7D

http://www.americasright.com/2008/12/eligibility-cases-make-drudge-report.html

Update from Mr. Berg Regarding Berg v. Obama - To Be Set For Conference In Supreme Court

Philip Berg, Esq. has an update on his lawsuit against Sen. Obama. It too should be set for Conference soon.

This is from ObamaCrimes:
U.S. Supreme Court Update Regarding The December 01, 2008 Deadline

Thursday, 04 December 2008 01:46

We understand everyone is eager to learn what occurred on December 1, 2008, at the U.S. Supreme Court. There is a rumor claiming Mr. Obama was Court Ordered by Justice Souter to turn over his birth certificate by December 1, 2008. This is NOT true.

When a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari is filed the Defendants automatically are given thirty (30) days to respond. They are not required to respond. The end of thirty (30) Days in the Berg v. Obama case was December 1, 2008. Keep in mind, the Defendants could have mailed in a response to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and the Court allows approximately a week for mail. If this is the case, the envelopes must be postmarked December 1, 2008.

In the afternoon, December 1, 2008, Lisa, Mr. Berg's Assistant contacted the U.S. Supreme Court and spoke with the Clerk. The Clerk informed Lisa Mr. Berg's Petition for Writ of Certiorari would be distributed to all nine (9) Justices and a conference should be set within ten (10) days....Continue Reading

______________________________________

Comment:
It would be amazing if the American media would do their jobs and report/investigate these historic challenges to what seems to be Obama's attempt to intentionally skirt the eligibility requirements set forth in the Constitution of the United States. Obama spending $800,000 dollars to hide a $10 dollar long form birth certificate says something in and of itself.

It seems our media is so invested in Obama that they are now acting as his public relations firm instead of a news service. Yesterday, I linked to a post where it was shown that Pravda is reporting on these lawsuits. At least our media should strive to be as good as the media from the former USSR.

Remember the 24/7 news coverage of a bathroom stall toe tapping incident involving Sen. Larry Craig? The media could not get enough of it. I think they even reported on how young children were reacting to the incident. Remember Mark Foley? 24/7 news coverage! How about Larry Sinclair and his alleged encounters with Sen. Obama? Zero, Zip, Nada news coverage from our highly trained advertising (news?) professionals.

Larry Sinclair's story is important because it reflects the continuing pattern of Obama and the media making up or hiding the facts to suit Sen. Obama's ambitions. Sen. Obama in his books indicated that he stopped using drugs early in his life. Larry Sinclair has alleged that he and Sen. Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999, much later than the account in his books.

Obama's storyline from his books does not fit the facts as revealed by others. Larry Sinclair - sex and drugs. Obama's grandmother - Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii. Hospitals in Hawaii - no record of Obama being born here. Etc. Etc. Etc.

Where is the media? AWOL or actively working to undermine the truth.

This morning I received from Sen. Obama an offer to purchase a holiday, seasons greetings, Obama mug. Amazing. This is just another part of the reinforcement of the Obama cult mentality objective. How do we set about doing a mass deprogramming effort in America?

Pravda Reports Obama Citizenship Issue and MSM Continues to Pretend It Doesn't Exist!

The good folks at Talk Wisdom have an interesting post up today that profoundly illustrates the irresponsibility of the American Media:

Pravda Reports but U.S. MSM Doesn't!

Nice Deb reports: Now I've friggin' seen it all. Pravda Now More Open And Honest Than U.S. MSM

Excerpt:

Barack Obama is truly an amazing man, with many amazing friends. He has succeeded where countless others have failed. And he has also succeeded where many before him have succeeded with the same time honored methods.

He has managed to create an illusion of a Public Office that does not exist, The Office of the President Elect.

Barry Sotero, AKA Barack Obama, along with the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission have successfully ignored a Federal Lawsuit asking him to produce a valid Birth Certificate. When the time to respond to that lawsuit expired, under Federal Court Rules, they all admitted that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and deemed to have committed fraud. A normal man would have been found to have admitted he was not a US citizen.

But the man with no visible past, was blessed by a light shining from above on a Federal Judge, by having the lawsuit against him dismissed, three weeks after his non-response was proof that he is not a US citizen.

That lawsuit has since been taken to the US Supreme Court, where Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission have until December 1, 2008 to answer the complaint made against them.

Another lawsuit by another attorney against him to prove he is a US citizen has been scheduled for a conference of Justices of the US Supreme Court on December 5, 2008.

Can this disconnect between the blogs and the Media of Mass Deception get any more weird or what??...


...Continue Reading


Comment: Maybe Larry Sinclair should advertise his new book in Russia also, they seem to be more interested in being given information than Americans. Larry Sinclair has made allegations that he and Sen. Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999. Where has our media been? AWOL - I tip my hat to PRAVDA for at least reporting on the existence of the these lawsuits.